A Heart of Worship
Posted on August 3rd, 2010
By God’s grace, I’ve been a Christian for a long time. That time is getting longer every day. So when I look at what God continues to teach me through His Word, I can only shake my head at my thick-headedness and my pride… and whatever else it is that keeps me from learning the centrality of the gospel.That’s what’s been hammered home over the past months as the Gospel of John has been a constant companion. The centrality of the gospel… which is to say, the centrality of Jesus Christ.
Bowing to myself? Or worshiping Jesus?
It isn’t only that he miraculously fed thousands, or healed incredibly recalcitrant diseases, or stopped storms. It isn’t even that he said he was the bread of life, or the resurrection and the life, or the source of living water.
It’s that he really is those things. On an ongoing basis.
Religion, as helpful as it can be, often gets in my way. What I mean by that is that religion can be twisted (by me) to be a sinful practice, not an edifying one. I can run self-metrics, rather than joyful worship: how much prayer have I been investing in; whether I’ve fasted recently; how many people have I “touched,” “checked in” with, or otherwise “ministered” to; whether I’ve avoided a particular sin I’d like to have ‘victory’ over. I start having pride, not in my repentant response to sin, but in my superficial, external cleanliness. In my diligence and efficiency. And so I functionally put my hope in my performance of “good” things… not realizing that they have no goodness in themselves. They have goodness (and are fruit) only if they are truly worship of a worthy object.
Eventually… when my eyes are opened… I look again at my own heart, eager for self-exaltation, and again have to come to the cross… repenting…asking forgiveness… and putting my trust, my only hope… in my Savior.
Jesus is my bread of life (John 6:35). He is what I take in, forever.
Jesus is my light (John 8:12). He’s the only way I see… ever.
Jesus is my shepherd (John 10:11). He leads and cares and finds me.
Jesus is my resurrection (John 11:25). He’s the only reason I’ll live forever.
Jesus is my life (John 11:25). He is, right now. I only act like my life is about me.
Or, to put the above into the negative statements they infer:
On my own I starve.
On my own I’m blind.
On my own I’m lost.
On my own I’ll die, or perhaps I’m dead already.
On my own I have no life now.
Why do I think I could ever do anything on my own?
This is why I was so struck by Mary this week, in John 12. Heartfelt worship… not posed, not calculated, not even fully understood… but entirely appropriate because of the object of the worship.
Jesus Christ.
May our hearts be filled with grateful joy at the life our Savior gives. May we find joy in prayer because it is with him… may we excitedly follow where he leads… May we find all we are in His finished work on our behalf… and our certain future in union with Him.
Tags: John
Filed under In Christ | 1 Comment »
Grace… toward each other
Posted on June 14th, 2010
Ok… I’m posting today, because it has been a long time… but I’m also quite ill today… so if this seems like a ramble, or doesn’t make sense… blame me. And my illness.
As I live under the incredible reality that grace and truth came through Jesus Christ (John 1:17), and as I grow in the grace and knowledge of my Savior (2 Peter 3:18), I continue to be overwhelmed with the centrality for my life of the person and work of Jesus Christ.
Not in a Sunday-School-the-answer-is-always-Jesus kind of way, but how I wish that my words were clearer, that my life was more reflective, of the reality of Christ. He isn’t a substantial part of my salvation - He is my salvation. He’s my righteousness, my redemption, my sanctification, my justification… and the big words don’t even begin to capture, really, the essence of the grace and truth that Jesus Christ brings.
So often it seems like “church” becomes a following of a subset of Christ’s teachings, plus a variety of other traditions and cultural norms that a community chooses for itself. While this may be comfortable, it is limiting and narrow and so often isn’t overwhelmed with the true heart of the church… Jesus.
John MacArthur, in a question-and-answer session at the 2007 Shepherd’s Conference, gives this helpful answer to a pastor wanting to confront this type of “legalism” - not in the sense of works salvation, but in the sense of the narrow behavioral norms and needless (i.e. not biblically mandated) restrictions that so many churches hold to:
“I would suggest that the first way to do that is to move people off the rules they live by on to the person of Jesus Christ, and just preach the glories of Christ. Get in a Gospel and stay there until those people have been liberated from rules to love for Christ, until they have been literally swept away in awe and wonder over their affections for Jesus Christ. Rather than try to instruct them on the biblical disciplines, which again is just another set of rules, let them be lost in wonder, love, and praise over the person of Christ, and you watch those things begin to disappear.”
Can we get to a place of being liberated from restrictive rules? Not being against morality or obedience in any way - but centering that morality and obedience in a passion and love and awe and wonder and praise at our Savior?
I think that one main hindrance is pride. Pride pushes me towards never conceding that someone else might see truth better… that I have no self-righteousness to hold onto… that Christ really is my everything. Pride leads me to hedge the truth and steal from grace… and ultimately the wonder of our Savior is not served by my words.
I hope that you (whomever might read this) and I can get away from ourselves enough to actually dive into the real truth that Scripture brings - the gospel, the good news of our Savior.
I like how Kevin DeYoung puts it, in an article at First Things:
“We are all proud. Because I’m proud I get hurt when people disagree with me strongly. Because I’m proud I feel the need to give thirteen qualifications before I make an argument, not usually because I’m a swell guy but because I love for people to love me and loathe for them to dislike or misunderstand me. Because I’m proud I hedge my criticisms so that I won’t have to publicly repent and recant when I go too far and get something wrong. Because we’re proud, protectors of self more than lovers of truth, we often don’t discuss things with candor or with verve.”
This convicts me. My hedging can be more a result of fear of man and pride than a result of concern for the truth. And I look back at my very first sentence above… and get convicted. Why do we shy away from truth?
“And from him [God] you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption, so that, as it is written, ‘Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord’” (1 Corinthians 1:30-31).
May we clearly proclaim (and really believe) what is already true: that Jesus Christ, our glorious Savior, is our wisdom, righteousness, sanctification and redemption… and may all our boasting be only in Him.
(h/t to Andy Naselli’s excellent blogs on these issues)
Tags: 1 Corinthians 1:30, DeYoung, Macarthur, Naselli
Filed under Grace, In Christ | No Comments »
Grace in the Word
Posted on May 25th, 2010
I’ve not been posting much… but partly that’s because I’ve been reading a lot. I’m always tempted to just post a few quotes. I’m resisting, today. But here’s some of what’s on my plate right now, reading-wise:
The Gospel-Driven Life, by Michael Horton. Almost a must-read book, absolutely fantastic. Our men’s group at church is reading this, and the discussion has been insightful and helpful to my Christian walk.
Rescuing Ambition, by Dave Harvey. So far my favorite quote is “God’s glorious ambition for our lives begins with who we are.” Close behind: “We need to be saved by works - not ours, but Jesus Christ’s!” I’m only partway in… he’s doing a great job of not forgetting the gospel as he urges us to have the right kind of ambition.
The Evangelical Universalist. The author wants to at least raise the possibility biblically that there is room in orthodoxy for universal restoration. Not my position. So it is interesting to understand how someone can come to a very different conclusion than my understanding of the Bible.
Worship Matters. Bob Kauflin really has a marvelous tone and heart for truly worshiping God - not only in song, but certainly in what we are singing.
“Redrawing the Line Between Hermeneutics and Application,” by Brian Shealy, in Bob Thomas’ Evangelical Hermeneutics.
This last one is what I really want to share on today. I doubt any of my friends will read Shealy’s essay; it is a bit dry, and in a fairly technical book. But what he’s saying is deep, good, and true.
We live in a day when large theological words - words like ‘exegesis,’ ‘homiletics,’ ‘hermeneutics,’ ‘interpretation,’ ‘expository’ - are sometimes used but often not clearly understood. What so many well-meaning people say is that they want to ‘obey the Bible.’ And what that excellent phrase ends up meaning is a confusion of application and interpretation. Perhaps more accurately, well-meaning Christians can skip interpretation for the more ‘practical’ application piece. Finding an application becomes the interpretation.
This seems good but can quickly become deadly.
One can go to Leviticus 11:6-11 and find wonderful application (a Christian shouldn’t eat rabbits, pigs, or shellfish) that absolutely ignores the context and purpose of “clean” and “unclean.” That’s jumping right to application, without finding out what the text means.
Another example is Psalm 15. “O Lord, who shall sojourn in your tent? Who shall dwell on your holy hill? He who walks blamelessly and does what is right”… and the psalm goes on to describe four main areas: not slandering, despising the wicked, keeping vows, and not lending money at interest. An application-based jump goes right to “this is how you keep holy and right before God - do these four things.” Proper interpretation, in contrast, would actually lead to an examination of context to understand the basis of the Psalms, of messianic influences, and also in cross-reference to understand that Jesus Christ alone is blameless. From a right interpretation (read: understanding), application can then be made.
The difficulty of the Bible for the church is a primarily interpretive difficulty. The Bible is a message of truth from God. Understanding that truth is the basis for all else. If you do not get the truth, then you end up applying untruth. You end up saying things are from God when they are not. You end up with a thoroughly human message given in human power.
This skipping of interpretation is deadly because the actual original message of the Bible is what is powerful. The truth of the Bible is described as the “sword of the Spirit” (Ephesians 6:17). This word is living and active and piercing (Hebrews 4:12). And what we can do, if we are not careful, is substitute in our human message, our “application,” instead of the truth, the interpretation, that the Holy Spirit actually uses to pierce souls.
Shealy puts it this way: Preachers “cannot allow human self-centeredness or even enthusiasm for obedience to influence their use of hermeneutical principles. They must study God’s Word objectively to determine the original message that God intended.”
I’m convinced this emphasis is critical is because the original message is the Gospel. From Genesis to Revelation, the message is about Jesus Christ, the Messiah, the Son of God, the Son of Man, the Beginning and the End, about righteousness and sanctification and adoption and union and justification… all in and by and through Him.
In a rush to application there can be an abandonment of the actual truth of God’s message as stated in the passage the application is taken from. If there is a daily struggle for me as a pastor, it is here. Shealy rightly states that “only this goal [true interpretation] will exalt God’s Word to its proper place.”
Bernard Ramm, in Protestant Bible Interpretation, states this issue similarly in a rule: “What is not a matter of revelation cannot be made a matter of creed or faith.”
I suppose that some might disagree, but to my mind and heart the desperate need of our churches is in this area of interpretation. For those who are born of the Spirit, who know Jesus Christ, the desire for application rightly follows salvation. And then many are run into misguided activities based on poor interpretation of the powerful Word of God. My prayer and my hope is that our activity will be enlightened by and based on the truth that is from God, in the revelation He has given us in Jesus Christ.
May we treasure, and make effort to understand, the incredible riches given to us in the Word of God.
Tags: Application, Interpretation, Shealy
Filed under Grace, Quotes | 1 Comment »
The (right) doctrinal drop
Posted on May 6th, 2010
We’ve been spending time as a church in John’s gospel, and what it says continues to impact my life. I’ve been thinking about how Jesus affirms the religious folk of the day - “you search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life” (John 5:39).
That’s me, I think. I search, diligently search, the Scriptures. I think that in them is life. I read and consider and meditate. I want to obey.
But actually, Jesus slams these diligent searchers: “…yet you refuse to come to me, that you may have life.”
Ouch.
It is possible to be a Scripture-searcher and not get the content.
Now, before you jump right to the “normal” conclusion - that doctrine has to go the 15 inches from the head to the heart - please bear with me. That’s not really what Jesus is saying.
When we say that, we mean that people are “eggheads,” full of knowledge about Jesus but not “doing” the Christian life.
Jesus, though, is saying that the “doctrine” of these Bible-searchers is actually wrong because it is not grounded in Him.
He’s saying that all their “doing” of Scripture gets them nowhere… they’ve made a head-to-heart connection all right, but it is the wrong one. They are are busy practically “doing” Scripture… and they have no life.
Why? Because Scripture isn’t primarily a collection of rules, a list of behaviors, or even an instruction manual on life.
Scripture is about Jesus.
If we don’t understand the reality of Jesus, we won’t really understand the Bible. And we won’t get life. That’s because of what the Bible actually says. The Bible points us to salvation by faith alone, through grace alone, in Christ alone.
Many - most, perhaps - nod heads sagely at this brief recitation of the Solas. Yet too many of us (me included) often don’t actually function like this amazing message — the main content of the Bible – is true.
Yes, the Bible is about Jesus.
Yes, the Bible is about the gospel… pointing to the redeemer, the messiah, the savior of the world.
Yes, the Bible is about life in Him - by faith.
Yet we still show that we don’t really get the Bible by our faithlessness, by our trusting in other things (ourselves, our works, our goodness) than in Jesus Christ.
I like how Tim Chester puts it. See if this makes sense to you:
“Problems for Christians do not often arise because of disbelief in a confessional or theoretical sense (though this may be case). More often they arise from functional or practical disbelief. Asked if I believe in justification by faith, I may reply that I do (confessional faith), but still feel the need to prove myself (functional disbelief). I may affirm that God is sovereign (confessional faith), but still get anxious when I cannot control my life (functional disbelief). Indeed, sanctification can be viewed as the progressive narrowing of the gap between confessional faith and functional faith.”
If you say - yes, that’s me - then there’s hope for you, in turning back to God in faith. In actually believing in our justification by our Savior, in actually trusting in His sovereignty and His work in us. And in crying out to Him who bore our sins on the cross when we fail.
Hmm… maybe there’s something to that doctrinal drop into the heart after all… as long as what is actually dropping down is the wondrous truth of the gospel.
May we grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (2 Peter 3:18)!
Tags: Chester
Filed under Grace, In Christ, Quotes | 1 Comment »
Grace and justification
Posted on April 17th, 2010
If you have time, consider watching John Piper’s recent address at Together for the Gospel. The conference was on the “unadulterated Gospel,” and Piper particularly looked at imputed righteousness — is it what Jesus taught, or only Paul?
That might sound heady… but I appreciate how it is so impacting to practical living, to get the foundations of faith right.
I particularly was impacted by how Jesus does not justify the one who is thanking God for righteousness based in himself. This is not legalism, but a trust in your own righteousness, even righteousness that you trust God has given you. Wow. Piper does a wonderful job exposing Christ’s view of salvation and the proper view of our works.
It appears they are ok with embedding it, so it’s below… if I find out otherwise, I’ll replace it with a link… Be sure to persevere, as the first 10 minutes are pretty heady… but it is really worth listening to the whole thing (and it gets easier!).
T4G 2010 — Session 6 — John Piper from Together for the Gospel (T4G) on Vimeo.
Tags: Piper, T4G
Filed under Righteousness | No Comments »
Repentance revealing grace
Posted on April 16th, 2010
I ran across this helpful quote today. It is on the topic of repentance.
“The difference between an unconverted and a converted man is not that the one has sins and the other has none; but that the one takes part with his cherished sins against a dreaded God and the other takes part with a reconciled God against his hated sins.” (William Arnot, Laws from Heaven for Life on Earth, 1884, p.311)
I like Arnot’s pointing to repentance as the key between one born again and one not. I can hear him asking, “Whose side are you on?”
It reminds me of the close association of repentance and belief. Jesus commands us to do both in Mark 1:15 – “repent and believe in the gospel” – and yet often, as the well-known John 3:16, belief in the Son of God encompasses repentance: “whoever believes in him shall not perish…”
It seems that to believe in the gospel is to believe in your own horrible state and the depth of your offense to God… and to trust Him both for forgiveness and righteousness… as Arnot says, to “take part with a reconciled God against his hated sins.”
I also appreciate that this removes repentance as a work and puts it as a unity with faith. I’ve often heard it said that repentance is more than a “change of mind” but an “actual turning,” and as such, must be actually seen externally. A “turn” from old behavior, if you will.
Yet you and I still sin.
As Greg Gilbert explains in his little book What is the Gospel?, “Because we will continue to struggle with sin until we are glorified, we have to remember that genuine repentance is more fundamentally a matter of the heart’s attitude toward sin than it is a mere change of behavior” (p.81).
This is repentance that is a critical component of faith. A change of my heart to agree with God’s view of me; how wretched I am! How wondrous that I am cleansed, forgiven, declared righteous, and grown in faith and godliness!
May we never think that we can change our own ways before coming to God; nor that we can simply assent to the fact of Christ’s death and resurrection and consider that ‘belief.’
Grace really is amazing — even more so as I see the depths of my offense against God. Thank you, Lord, for opening my eyes, even a little bit, to it. And as I see it more, thank you for the depth of love which bore the price of such offence on the cross.
Tags: Arnot, Gilbert, John 3:16
Filed under Grace, Repentance | 1 Comment »
Remember the gospel again
Posted on March 29th, 2010
“Remember the gospel again; hear his humble plea in the garden, see his blood-stained brow, hear the whip crack as it tears his back, smell the scent of blood that fills the air as he is hoisted up upon the tree, hear him cry in agony as the wrath you deserve is poured out upon him, and he is forsaken.
Then let his words sink deeply into your soul, “It is finished.” All that he had come to do, all that you needed him to do, he has done for you.
Feel the earth tremble, hear the curtain that separated you from the presence of God tear.
Think about that kind of love and welcome, let your heart weep before him, and kiss him in worship as you humble yourself, loving him much.
Now, let the love that’s overflowing in your heart eventuate in true obedience, put off your old, dead, loveless ways of living, and let the love that has been poured into your heart by the Holy Spirit create true holiness of life.”
(from Counsel from the Cross, by Elyse Fitzpatrick and Dennis Johnson)
Amen.
Tags: Fitzpatrick, Johnson
Filed under In Christ, Quotes | No Comments »
Glory full of grace and truth - without video
Posted on March 9th, 2010
John 1:14 reads, “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.”
I was thinking about Jesus, the unique Son of God, the maker of the universe, in flesh on the earth. I was thinking that I wish I could have seen him. At the time that John is writing about above, when he “became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory.”
Aside from seeing “his glory” - what about just seeing him? How tall was he? Did he have a favorite color? Did he like to sing?
This led me to think about video and the Bible. As we preach and teach and use today’s media (mp3 audio, web-hosted video, etc) I was struck that Jesus came to a time and place that had no such modern information-transmittal technology.
Did He look like this?
I was struck that all I know about Jesus, I know from a book. Written language. Even when I watch a “dramatization” of the Bible, or watch a preacher… what they know is from a book.
I’m thinking of how perfect God is in his planning, that this written display of his character is true. It means that image is not as important as substance is. Ideas are the key issue, communication via memes and pericopes and languages. Much care has to be taken to get them right - to translate rightly, to understand rightly… but what God has chosen is the Word.
Think if that wasn’t the case.
I’d look at my Savior and think things like: “He had a beard! I should too!” or I’d be tempted to make sandals the godly man’s footwear. I’d want to see what foods Jesus ate, and eat them (did Jesus eat meat? Let’s zoom in on what he’s eating, that must be the best food…). How often did He smile? Did He keep His fingernails trimmed?
The video aspect of what really happened when the incarnate God came to earth would, unfortunately, be fertile ground for my innate legalism, I fear. It would be fertile ground for my desire to make inconsequential things consequential, and non-ultimates ultimate.
Which is why I return to being so grateful for the Word. He said what was important, communicated it, with language. So I’m not distracted by the style of his garments or the color of his skin.
And so I come back to seeing “his glory.” I think John is saying that we all, who are his kids, have seen his glory, just as “we have all received” grace from him in v. 16.
And the glory you and I have seen, who are Christians, is the glory that is “full of grace and truth.”
How amazing can it be, 2000 or so years after the Word became flesh, that I can see his glory… in the depth of the grace that I have tasted in him. True forgiveness. Promised heaven. Understanding reality, what is true. All because of him… and thus revealing his glory.
It just makes me stop and worship… that without 1080p or iPhone apps or Flash (as great as those are)… you and I get to experience the true glory of God, in the grace and faithfulness of the Son.
To Him be the glory forever!
Tags: Grace, John 1:14
Filed under Grace | No Comments »
Less optimism, more worship
Posted on February 2nd, 2010
I think sometimes that I’m too much of an optimist.
It’s true. I bounce. I love the beauty of the sky. I have experienced such blessings.
Beautiful creation... soiled, polluted
But I also tend to think that people are innately ok. Especially Christians, with the new creation, the new covenant.
And so I speed over the sea of sin that we swim in. Really. Sin is real. Sin is horrific. Husbands, wives, parents, kids, work relationships… fallen. We experience pain - not just physical pain, but the pain of disappointment, of spiritual hurt and loss.
The very best Christians I know, pastors, servants… flawed.
Perhaps a more realistic view of my world - less unreal optimism, more recognition of sin - actually leads to a more worshipful relationship with my God.
That’s because reality is that sin does hang on. The life-and-godliness-power that I’ve been given is a knowledge of Jesus Christ, which is to say, of the gospel (2 Peter 1:3).
And the knowledge of Christ is incredibly freeing because it stands is such stark contrast with my experiential knowledge of me and of other people.
Think on this, from Elyse Fitzpatrick and Dennis Johnson, in Counsel from the Cross:
“Either we train ourselves and others to put our trust in our ability and then hope for the best, or we train ourselves and others to self-despair and to live ‘on in naked confidence in the mercy of God.’ We will view God as either the “rewarder of all our ‘good’ works, the pot of gold at the end of our rainbow of merit,” or as our merciful Father who inexplicably identifies with us, loves and welcomes us, and rewards us with blessing despite our sin and failures…
The point is precisely that the power to do good comes only out of this wild claim that everything has already been done.” (pp. 180-1)
I need to stop, again, and not put my trust in my ability… but instead wholly trust Jesus Christ.
The gospel is that Jesus Christ, the firstborn of the dead, has “freed us from our sins by his blood” (Revelation 1:6) even when I don’t exhibit it, nor feel freed.
The gospel is that Jesus has ransomed people for God with his blood, at great cost. His blood is the grounds for my acceptance, not my moral fiber. And it continues to be the grounds… all through life.
The Bible actually says this in wonderful ways.
Let’s just take one, 1 Corinthians 6:11. Speaking of our sin, Paul writes:
And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
It isn’t that we became more moral, or had some extra individual goodness. It is that we were washed, and sanctified, and justified by Jesus.
Washing in 1 Corinthians 6:11 (as in other verses, like Titus 3:5) doesn’t refer to moral amendment or inward holiness but to deliverance from guilt, and the estrangement from God which sin has caused. These passages, as George Smeaton in his excellent book on the atonement notes, “are rightly explained only when we take them in their sacrificial reference.”
My sin has been atoned for, regarded as if it had never been. It is my Savior’s bloody death which makes me clean… not my post-salvation perfection or moral aptitude.
I can still experience sin and the effects of sin, and I still struggle with sin… but I know it is covered… and the grateful fruit of worship and service grows.
That fruit may mean that I struggle less… but even when I fall, I know that my standing is sure, because it is not based on my struggle, but on the blood of Jesus Christ. By faith I am saved, and even that a gift.
We have such great reason to be optimists… not because we will not experience pain, disappointment, and sin… but because we know our standing is sure, and our Savior has removed our guilt, and we have a glorious future in Him.
Truly he has saved us according to his own mercy… praise be to Jesus Christ forever!
Tags: 1 Corinthians 6:11, Fitzpatrick
Filed under Grace, In Christ, Righteousness | No Comments »
Auld Lang Syne
Posted on January 2nd, 2010
2010 has officially begun. Every year seems to go more quickly than the last; it will probably take me three months just to get my mind to think of this year as 2010 and not 2009.
Thinking about the New Year and times passing makes me think of Auld Lang Syne. The song is an old Scottish one, and the phrase is, loosely translated, Times gone by.
Times gone by. 2000 years since my Savior was on earth. 233-odd years of the United States as a country. 4-some odd years since my grandparents went to be with the Lord. 3 years since we were blessed with our first child.
Times gone by.
Theologically, I wonder about humanity in all these years. Are the issues the same, through the centuries? Does the church struggle with the same doctrinal questions? Were people of years past more strongly planted, more firmly founded, than we in our day are?
I’ve just finished reading a book which speaks to that question… it’s called The Christian Leaders of the Last Century. But it’s not about the 1900’s. It was written by J. C. Ryle in the 1800’s, of Christian leaders in the early 1700’s. So it is fascinating to see what he (in the 1800’s) thought the issues of church leaders were 100 years prior… what he brings out, and how the men are presented. He details 11 men in England, all clergy, including a couple that you’ve heard of (Whitehead, Wesley) and many that you (probably) haven’t.
I’ve been amazed at the piercing commentary that Ryle has of the spiritual walk and foundation of these men who lived before the United States existed. He could be speaking of people I know, of concerns I have, of struggles seen all around me.
Let me quote just a couple:
On John Berridge, curate of Stapleford:
“Berridge entered on his duties with great zeal, and a sincere desire to do good, and served his church regularly from college for no less than six years. He took great pains with his parishioners, and pressed upon them very earnestly the importance of sanctification, but without producing the slightest effect on their lives. His preaching…was striking; his life was moral, upright, and correct. His diligence as a pastor was undeniable… (but) the fact was that up to this time he was utterly ignorant of the gospel. He knew nothing aright of Christ crucified, of justification by faith in His blood, of salvation by grace, of the complete present forgiveness of all who believe…”
Berridge himself relates that He “saw the rock on which he had been splitting for many years, by endeavoring to blend the Law and the Gospel, and to unite Christ’s righteousness with his own.” His ministry over the next thirty years then bore much fruit as he preached Jesus Christ alone and salvation by faith alone.
It is striking and helpful to see J.C. Ryle, in the 1800’s, look at spiritual growth in John Berridge, in the 1700’s, and positively represent the necessity of the gospel - faith alone, imputed righteousness alone.
It’s not only with John Berridge. Another example is another clergy, James Hervey of Weston Favell. Ryle relates his early ministry as one of sincerity and purity of mind and zeal… but one who had not yet got his feet on the Rock. He relates a letter by George Whitefield, a contemporary, to Hervey:
“I long to have my dear friend come forth and preach the truth as it is in Jesus; not a righteousness or holiness of our own, whereby we make ourselves meet, but the righteousness of another, even the Lord our righteousness; upon the imputation and apprehending of which by faith we shall be made meet by His Holy Spirit to live with and enjoy God.” (Whitefield, to Hervey).
Hervey, like Berridge, was preaching morality and self-righteousness mixed into the gospel.
The wonderful account that is recorded by Ryle is… that Hervey grew.
At a later date, Hervey wrote to Whitefield:
“I own, with shame and sorrow, I have been a blind leader of the blind. My tongue and my pen have perverted the good ways of the Lord, have darkened the glory of redeeming merit and sovereign grace. I have dared to invade the glories of an all-sufficient Saviour, and to pluck the crown off His head My writings… presumed to give works a share in the redemption and recovery of a lost sinner…”
Ryle notes how interesting to see the work of the Spirit slowly in the life of Hervey, moving his theological opinions more in line with God’s truth in the grace of His Son.
How fascinating! This is the 1700’s!
From reading this book about men I do not personally know who lived before my great-great-great grandfather was alive, I’m encouraged. The issues are the same: the gospel vs. anything else. And the Spirit worked then, as now, in opening eyes and changing hearts… some quickly, some slowly, but all who are His come to know His redeeming grace from which truth, righteousness, and salvation flow.
Happy New Year, all. And as Auld Lang Syne, may you (and I) continue to grow in the grace and truth that is in Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory, now and forever.
Tags: History, Ryle
Filed under Grace, Righteousness | No Comments »